1

hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

Agreed that it is a military facility. This entire area seems to have a heavy military presence. However, I do not see the aircraft as stated in the previous commentary. Another argument against an airfield is the number of obstacles across this area. Specifically, power lines/power poles that cross the entire site at odd angles. The distances and angles would allow only for very short take-off and landing. If indeed there are heavy transport aircraft, they would need a very much greater runway than as shown between the obstacles. Additionally, The tracks left by the vehicles in the area are not tracks from taxiing aircraft, they are the tracks of heavy wheeled and tracked vehicles.Anyone else? If we get enough eyes on this thing, we can figure it out and get good-paying jobs at NSA or CIA as satphoto analysts. Big money. Clean labs. Yup!

И что за личности это были?)